SONY VEGAS VERSUS ADOBE PREMIERE PRO

there are others but most of them were never updated to the NT platform. Simple Hack & Slash Editors: ]]ġ0) -we have a tie- Honestech & ArcSoft & MGI & Vegas Standard Editorġ4) Magix MP3 maker ( yes, the MP3 maker and Audio Restoration software have their own Video Editors as well ) ħ) Ulead ( my,my,my how the mighty have fallen T_T ) again, this software uses options already installed on your hard drive. well, actually, that's not right for Magix to be in this location because any prior Magix software loaded on your machine will be utilized from the Video Editor without opening the main software programs to access it: Magix uses its other software Applications options like Premiere and Vegas handle Plug-ins. When it comes to 'the main interface' and not having to call in a separate program to solve an issue, the winners are: when you've been around as long as I have, you do not see the price tag's as being the Solution to a problem - all you want to do is Edit things when you want to without leaving the main interface of the project your working-on.

each of these editors solves problems that the others do not address as being, 'worthy problems to solve' and THAT is what makes the Vegas side of this equation soo interesting the only real difference between these two is, 'how they get around different issues.' From an Animators point of view, Premiere wins 3rd place everytime ( Asymetrix and Avid really have no equals in the Frame-by-Frame Editing department! ) From an Editors point of view, Vegas wins 2nd place every time ( AiST, Vegas, followed by Ulead, Magix, MGI, AVS Editor and VirtualDub - in that order.

SONY VEGAS VERSUS ADOBE PREMIERE PRO

Vegas can handle 23.976 fps footage without problems, whereas Premiere Pro CS3 may not (previous versions definitely had issues).

Sony vegas versus adobe premiere